Our lefthanded President turned to Communism – Most of them Anyways.
The phrase “fundamentally change America” is often associated with former President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign rhetoric. During a campaign stop in Columbia, Missouri, on October 30, 2008, Obama stated, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” This statement was made in the context of his promise for change in the nation’s politics and policies after years of what he described as broken politics in Washington and failed policies from the previous administration 1.
In a later interview with Bill O’Reilly in 2014, President Obama was asked about his statement regarding the fundamental transformation of the country. He clarified that he did not think it was necessary to fundamentally transform the nation but rather to ensure that hardworking Americans could get ahead, highlighting the importance of good jobs, education, and healthcare 1.
The interpretation of what “fundamentally transform” means can vary widely,
and discussions about it often reflect differing political views and ideologies.
For a more detailed exploration of President Obama’s policies and their impact,
consider looking into analyses and commentaries from various perspectives 1 2.
Obama’s Radical Past | National Review
Conservative political commentator Wayne Allyn Root opined back in 2010 that
President Obama “is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic
failure, economic crisis and social chaos.”
Claim: Wayne Allyn Root wrote in an opinion piece that Obama is “purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy.” Rahm Emanuel cynically said, “You never want
a crisis to go to waste.” It is now becoming clear that the crisis he was referring to
is Barack Obama’s presidency.
Dec 15, 2020
Obama Says He Wants to Control A “Frontman” President Through an Earpiece.
During an interview, former President Barack Obama expressed interest in controlling
a “frontman” President through an earpiece in order to have a de facto third term.
According to Obama, “If I could make an arrangement where I had a frontman and they had an earpiece in…and I was just in my basement…then I could deliver the lines…
I’d be fine with that”. Ironically, Joe Biden was Barack Obama’s Vice President.
Biden also is essentially unable to speak without using a teleprompter.
Obama and Marxism
BY DAVID WEIGEL
Ask Charles Koch what he thinks about Obama
and he looks like he’s just bit into a lemon.
Al Hunt goes after the Koch brothers for striking the “same theme”
as birthers and harping on Barack Obama’s Kenyan heritage.
He quotes them from Matthew Continetti’s long profile.
Bernie Sander’s 110-page Communist Manifesto – Search (bing.com)
“He’s a dedicated egalitarian,” Charles said. “I’m not saying he’s a Marxist,
but he’s internalized some Marxist models—that is, that business tends to
be successful by exploiting its customers and workers.”
David agreed. “He’s the most radical president we’ve ever had as a nation,” he said,
“and has done more damage to the free enterprise system and long-term prosperity than any president we’ve ever had.” David suggested the president’s radicalism was tied to his upbringing.
“His father was a hard-core economic socialist in Kenya,” he said.
“Obama didn’t really interact with his father face-to-face very much but was apparently from what I read a great admirer of his father’s points of view. So, he had sort of anti-business, anti-free enterprise influences affecting him almost all his life.
It just shows you what a person with a silver tongue can achieve.”
This really is a weird argument. Stanley Kurtz’s excellent research on Obama’s past and philosophy makes it very clear that he only read up seriously on socialism and Marxism when he got to Columbia. There is no evidence that Obama ever read his father’s economic papers; if he did, it’s unclear how dense tracts about the problems of post-colonial Kenya would have influenced his thinking about American urban/class politics and economics.
Some serious conservative pundits who are driven mad by birtherism feel that way because birtherism is such a loud, stupid distraction that any serious effort to dig into Obama’s past becomes impossible.
I think that’s true, even if I’m not convinced that a dig into Obama’s college classes and transcripts is going to deliver a killing blow to his presidential campaign. The arc of Obama’s career has been the arc of every modern liberal politician’s career – lefty college groupthink followed by liberal politics followed by big-money, centrist Democratic politics.
Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant.
He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos — thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.
Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of ’83).
As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they’re alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival … and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it. [Rest of article here.]
Obama’s Senior Thesis | The New Republic
Conservative provocateurs have been hunting for it. Investigative journalists have been on the prowl, too. Even a former professor has been searching through old boxes for his copy of it. But today Barack Obama made it official: He doesn’t have and can’t release any copies of the thesis-length paper he wrote 25 years ago while a senior at Columbia University.
“We do not have a copy of the course paper you requested and neither does Columbia University,” Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt told NBC News. … So we turned for answers to the former professor who graded the now-elusive paper. His former professor, Michael Baron, recalled in an interview with NBC News that Obama easily aced the year-long class. Baron described the paper as a “thesis” or “senior thesis” in several interviews and said that Obama spent a year working on it. Baron recalls that the topic was nuclear negotiations with the Soviet Union.
“My recollection is that the paper was an analysis of the evolution of the arms reduction negotiations between the Soviet Union and the United States,” Baron said in an e-mail.
“At that time, a hot topic in foreign policy circles was finding a way in which each country could safely reduce the large arsenal of nuclear weapons pointed at the other …
For U.S. policy makers in both political parties, the aim was not disarmament, but achieving deep reductions in the Soviet nuclear arsenal and keeping a substantial and permanent American advantage. As I remember it, the paper was about those negotiations, their tactics and chances for success. Barack got an A.”
Socialists, non-students emerge as leaders of anti-Israel protests on campuses:
As college campuses nationwide are wracked by anti-Israel protests – sometimes violent – socialists and non-students are emerging as leaders, even if they were not previously affiliated with the Palestinian cause. Many of the chants on Fordham University’s Lincoln Center campus this week were led by Matthew Smith, a freshman majoring in physics who told Just the News that he is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and is trying to start a Young Democratic Socialists of America chapter at Fordham.
“There is only one solution – intifada revolution,” Smith said while waving a flag and directing a crowd of demonstrators outside of the entrance to Fordham. “Intifada,” the Arabic word for “uprising,” is commonly used to refer to two periods of violent uprisings of Palestinians in Israel. The eras are marked by suicide bombings and the deaths of more than 5,000 Palestinians and 1,400 Israelis. The American Jewish Committee (AJC) says that the Arabic word “intifada” translates to “uprising” or “shaking off.”
Smith, who told Just the News that he does not “have any roots in Palestine,”
nor has he ever visited the region, said that intifada “literally just means revolution,”
and that “revolution can mean violence, but there’s also been a peaceful intifada.”
Although Smith led chants until his voice was hoarse during the protest Wednesday,
he did not organize the “Gaza Solidarity Encampment,” which formed around 8 a.m. Wednesday in Lowenstein Hall at Fordham.
The original organizer of the event appears to have been Fordham Students for Justice in Palestine, a group that the school never actually gave recognition to, despite a long legal battle to do so.
While Smith is a student at Fordham, not all of the protesters were. The Fordham encampment began Wednesday morning, hours after police broke up the encampment at Columbia University in New York City, and it ended later that day after 15 people were arrested. University President Tania Tetlow said administrators believe that at least some of those who were arrested are students.
Hundreds of people, including non-students, gathered outside the school in a protest in support of the encampment. Attendees included a man selling pro-Palestine gear, an elderly woman on a bicycle, neighborhood residents and more. For example, Manolo De Los Santos, the executive director of the self-described New York City-based “movement incubator” The People’s Forum, was at the protest. Although he said he has never been to the region of Palestine, De Los Santos said he has been at protests “across the city,” including Columbia University and City College, to support the students in their protests against Israel.
According to ABC News, the New York Police Department (NYPD) said in a preliminary analysis of the 282 people arrested Tuesday night at Columbia and the City College of New York 47% were not affiliated with either school. At Columbia, 32 people arrested were not affiliated with the university, while about 80 people were, according to the NYPD. At CCNY, 102 people arrested were not affiliated and 68 were, NYPD said. At an April 30 press conference, New York Mayor Eric Adams said that the protests have “basically been co-opted by professional outside agitators.”
Author of “Our Own Path to Socialism: Selected Speeches of Hugo Chávez,” De Los Santos said that the Fordham protest “is part of a large growing movement of students across the country who all feel very passionately that what their universities are doing by investing millions and millions of dollars, and Israeli genocide against Palestinians is wrong.”
David Clawson, who identified as an adjunct professor who teaches Latin American history at multiple schools, including previously at Fordham, said he was at the protest “because across the city students have been brutalized for standing up and saying that they want an end to genocide,” and he’s there “both to support the students, but ultimately to support the cause that they’re fighting.”
Clawson, who said he is a member of “multiple unions,” said there has been a “groundswell” of support for the pro-Palestinian movement, both over the past six months, when Israel was attacked on Oct. 7, 2023, but also in the “last few days” as protests have intensified across the nation.
“I think a lot of people are seeing that they also see that this is an interconnected struggle, and then actually fighting for socialist principles are a good thing to do,” Clawson said. “It is part of this larger struggle, and that it should be something that we shouldn’t be scared of.”
Jay Greene, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation Center for Education Policy, told Just the News that he thinks many of the student protestors do not understand what they are participating in. “These protests have remarkably little to do with people in the Middle East. And it has a lot more to do with the desires and needs of people here. And so when I look at the protests, I see a lot of very entitled elite college kids who are cosplaying being revolutionaries,” he said.
Former President Barack Obama’s Final Speech Before Departing Joint Base Andrews A.F.B. (Full) He knows all about Milking the System | NBC News (youtube.com)
Even though the school year is ending, Americans should be concerned that the protests could escalate, which is partially fueled by the fact that many of those involved have not been punished, he warned. “I think they should be concerned because not because these protesters are as a whole revolutionaries, but because things spiral out of control in ways that people don’t intend, and that that always could happen here. And it is something to be nervous about,” he said.
They’re Marxists or Neo Marxists involved in these campus takeovers and installation of radical theories at universities.
They’re NOT Socialists. Like Trump says their signs are too nice and clean. They were made by a professional printer. They all look the same. They all have the same tents. Follow the money. Check their emails. Check their text messages if it was done across state lines nationally it’s a federal crime.
Obama’s Connections to the Drug cartel – Search (bing.com)
So, who is really telling Biden what to say and do?
It cannot be said enough.
18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason
Obama’s Connection to the Muslim Brotherhood who helps fund terrorism.
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. The Birth Of Cultural Marxism: How The “Frankfurt School” Changed America | The Standard SC
The Frankfurt Group, also called the Frankfurt Gang or the Frankfurt Five,[1]
was a group of English-speaking composers and friends who studied composition under Iwan Knorr at the Hoch Conservatory in Frankfurt am Main in the late 1890s.[2]
The group included H. Balfour Gardiner, Norman O’Neill, Cyril Scott and Roger Quilter,
who were all English, and Percy Grainger and Frederick Septimus Kelly, who were born in Australia but established themselves as composers in England.[2] Although they did not study in Frankfurt all at the same time they remained close friends from their student days onwards.[3] See also: Critical theory
Knorr, though German-born, was strongly influenced by Russian music and was a believer in fostering the individuality of his pupils.[2] The Frankfurt group were united more by their friendship and their non-conformity than by any common aim,[4] though they did share a dislike of Beethoven,[5] and a resistance to the musical nationalism of the self-styled English Musical Renaissance of Hubert Parry and Charles Villiers Stanford, and of the later English Pastoral School of Ralph Vaughan Williams and Gustav Holst.[2]
All of them had a predilection for the music of Frederick Delius,[6] although there remains some doubt as to when the individual members first became aware of his music, which was certainly later than when they were a group in the 1890s.[7] The group was distinguished by its rebelliousness,[8] and by studying abroad they stood apart from the conservative wider English musical establishment.[3]
Grainger described the group as Pre-Raphaelite composers, arguing that they were musically distinguished from other British composers by “an excessive emotionality … particularly a tragic or sentimental or wistful or pathetic emotionality”, reached through a focus on chords rather than musical architecture or “the truly English qualities of grandeur, hopefulness and glory”.[8]
Most rebellious were Grainger and Scott, whose music often crossed the boundaries of accepted musical convention.[8] Scott’s work for a time gave up the use of bars and time signatures, while employing dissonant harmonies and highly individual orchestration.[2] The music of Quilter, O’Neill and (sometimes) Balfour Gardiner, shows an influence derived from Delius.[9]
The Frankfurt 5 came over from Germany in the early 1900’s, their goal was to spread socialism and the place they chose to set up
shop was on college campuses, and they have literally destroyed our once prestigious education system with the help of democrats.
Some of those fomenting the violence and hatred do not care about the lives of these young people. In fact, sacrificing a few of them as “martyrs” would help their cause. Those behind the activity are EVIL! Pray for their exposure and failure.
God’s answer in the 1960s and 70s was a Jesus Revolution. – Search (bing.com)
Millions of those kids were saved; thousands are today’s pastors and leaders. Had we added a true reforming and nation-discipling movement to the revival, as instructed by Jesus in Matthew 28, today’s young generation would not be so deceived and lost. It angers me. My heart breaks for this young generation. This may be a good time for some self-reflection, repentance, and intense intercession. It’s possible to curse the darkness, not the people-D. Sheets
The Frankfurt School is a school of thought in sociology and critical philosophy.
It is associated with the Institute for Social Research founded at Goethe University Frankfurt in 1923. Formed during the Weimar Republic during the European interwar period, the first generation of the Frankfurt School was composed of intellectuals, academics, and political dissidents dissatisfied with the contemporary socio-economic systems of the 1930s; namely, capitalism, fascism, and communism.
The Frankfurt theorists proposed that existing social theory was unable to explain the turbulent political factionalism and reactionary politics, such as Nazism, of 20th-century liberal capitalist societies. Also critical of Marxism–Leninism as a philosophically inflexible system of social organization, the School’s critical-theory research sought alternative paths to social development.
What unites the disparate members of the School is a shared commitment to the
project of human emancipation, theoretically pursued by an attempted synthesis of the Marxist tradition, psychoanalysis, and empirical sociological research.[1][2][3][4] Source: Frankfurt School – Wikipedia