LOVE is The Answer

Image result for love is the answer

Their is the sort of personality that Canadian physician Gabor Mate has studied extensively. Over his years in his family practice, Mate relates, he began  to  a pattern:  individuals  who were unable  to express anger, who didn’t seem to recognize the primacy of own needs.  Who were constantly doing  for others,  appeared to be the ones  that  are  most susceptible to a slew of ailments, from asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. These conditions are all also autoimmune disorders. Mate claims that, when an individual engages in      a long-term practice of ignoring or suppressing legitimate feelings–when   he/ is just plain too nice.  The immune system becomes compromised and confused, learning to attack the self rather than defend it. 

I feel it’s important to Love Life, Yourself, Someone of Just Something!!!!!

By far the strongest poison to the human spirit is the inability to forgive oneself                  or another person.💛☀

The Type C Personality: Are You Susceptible to Illness?

spiritual anatomy.jpg
Are you more susceptible to illness than other people? Do you have difficulty establishing proper boundaries in relationships, and communicating your needs?

You could be a Type C personality, which makes you more susceptible to illnesses, says Michael Jawer in the fascinating book he wrote with Marc Micozzi, M.D, Ph.D., called “The Spiritual Anatomy of Emotion: How Feelings Link the Brain, the Body, and the Sixth Sense,” which you can read about at www.emotiongateway.com.

Here’s what Michael writes about the Type C Personality:

In recent years, a cluster of personality characteristics has come to be identified as the Type C personality, someone who is at heightened risk for a slew of afflictions, from colds to asthma to cancer.
.
In contrast with the Type A person (who angers easily and has difficulty keeping his/her feelings under wraps) and the Type B person (who has a healthier balance of emotional expressiveness), the Type C person is a suppressor, a stoic, a denier of feelings.
.
He or she has a calm, outwardly rational, and unemotional demeanor, but  a tendency to conform to the wishes of others, a lack of assertiveness, and an inclination toward feelings of helplessness or hopelessness.
.

Extrovert

People who are outgoing, involved in their communities, and  also having strong social connections reap health benefits. An analysis of 148 studies published in the online journal PLoS medicine in July found that on average,  adults enrolled in the study with many close friendships were 50 percent likelier to survive until their study ended than were those with few friendships. A 2009 study published in Perspectives in Psychological Science suggests that social support leads to improved coping skills, healthy behavior, and an adherence to medical regimens.

Bonding with others also reduces stress and improves the immune system—so making friends and getting involved becomes, in effect, a well-being tonic. What drives at least some of the health benefits goes beyond biology, Miller says. “It may have to do with the fact that when you’re around people, you think, ‘Oh, Martha has gone for her mammogram—that reminds me, I should, too.’ ”

Eager to please

People-pleasers—Type C’s—are conforming, passive, and want to accommodate. That can be a good thing when it comes to patient compliance: They’re more likely to take the right medicines in the right doses at the right times, for instance—once they see a doctor, that is. Making and following through on appointments can be challenging for Type C’s, who tend to accept their fate as inevitable and fall readily into hopelessness and helplessness.

That means others must push them to take care of themselves. “They may be less likely    to maintain their health on their own,” Belamaric says. “If they develop a problem, they may just complain about it, hoping somebody says, ‘I have a good doctor, I’ll make you    an appointment.’

” Some Type C’s may be so mired that they don’t seek medical attention—even when it’s clearly necessary—and slough off preventive behaviors, like watching what they eat. “If they get a serious diagnosis, they may be passive, throw their hands up, and say, ‘Well, there’s nothing I can do about it, anyway. If it’s my time, it’s my time,’ ” Belamaric says.

Stressed and distressed

Type D’s—D is for distressed—dwell on negative emotions and are afraid to express themselves in social situations. Compared to more optimistic sorts, a Type D may face three times the risk for future heart problems, according to a recent study in the journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.

Type D’s also face a higher likelihood of compulsive overeating and substance abuse.         “If you’re a person who is prone to depression or anxiety, or if you’re overly self-critical, there’s more of a chance of turning to gratifying behavior to feel better,” Miller says.

Optimistic versus pessimistic

Optimism “heavily influences physical and mental health,” concluded a study published   in May in the journal Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health after researchers followed more than 500 males for 15 years.

The rate of heart-related deaths was 50 percent lower among optimists than among pessimists. “Optimists have a higher quality of life, and they may be more resilient in the way they deal with stress,” Miller says. “So if a problem comes along, they’re able to handle it better, and they become less symptomatic.”

Glass-half-empty types harbor little hope for the future and tend more toward depression and anxiety disorders. But also there’s a catch for those at the extreme end of the optimism spectrum:  They think of themselves as impervious to risks.  Extreme optimists who smoke are the best examples. They believe they won’t develop lung cancer. Why give up smoking   prevent a nonexistent risk?

The “self-healing personality”

That is the name Howard Friedman, a professor of psychology at the University of California-Riverside, attaches to people who are curious, secure, constructive, responsive, and conscientious.  These traits translate to enthusiasm for life,  emotional balance,  and strong social relationships. “Positive emotions buffer hormonal responses to stress,” says Friedman, whom studies the relationship between personality and longevity. Self-healers,  he says, “have healthier behavior patterns: more physical activity, a better diet, and less smoking and substance abuse.”

Are certain personality types more likely to get cancer? Since we know that our personality affects how we live and what we do, also personality can be a significant puzzle piece in our overall health.  Many years ago,  studies found that people with a “Type A” personality and traits such as impatience,  frustration, and hostility,  had a greater risk of heart attack than people with more easy-going personalities.  The search for links  between personality and cancer has turned up some interesting connections … and debunked some internet myths.

Certain personality traits may reduce your risk of cancer but not because of the traits themselves, but rather for what those traits lead you to do. For example, personality types who are positively engaged about their health will see their physicians regularly, consume healthful foods, and exercise regularly—all known factors that reduce their risk of cancer.

Personality types that are more impulsive, reckless, and less likely to even give a thought for their health increase their risk of cancer, however,  it is because they are more likely to smoke, drink to excess, be sedentary, and eat poorly. No scientifically sound studies have found that stress or grief can cause cancer. While prolonged emotional stress or profound grief can weaken the immune system, nobody has found any proof that these things cause cancer. So while persistent stress and grief are not good for your health, there is no indication that they increase your risk for cancer.

An interesting study from the University of Michigan found that people with plenty of social ties, including friends, family, and a sense of belonging to a community, had a lower overall death rate than loners—from all causes,  including those but not limited to cancer. Researchers suggest that having a social network causes us to take better care of ourselves and, if we do feel sick or threatened, to get support.

Social people who face illness or any type of setback may feel less vulnerable because        of their built-in support system. Moreover, these people-who-need-people are also more likely to hear positive advice and reinforcing messages about a healthy lifestyle from the folks who love them.

A person surrounded by family and friends will be urged (maybe even nagged) to go to   the doctor when symptoms occur. On the other hand, people who seek an isolated lifestyle and actively avoid making friends or having contact with others die at an earlier age.

Loners can pursue poor lifestyle choices with little opposition. When a crisis hits, the isolated individual has no one to turn to and may feel deeply threatened. A person with    no friends or family who faces a devastating illness may simply not have people around    to provide help and support. Thus, wanting to live without friends and family does not cause cancer, however,  it makes it harder to live a healthful lifestyle and to cope with a potentially life-threatening illness.

Some physicians have observed in their practice that cancer patients behave in similar ways. This may not be surprising in that all people faced with a cancer diagnosis are in a similar situation: fearful, stressed, confused. It has been stated that cancer patients are punctual, polite, submissive, and reserved.

These cancer patients often report “unfulfilled passions,” that is, they did not have a chance to do some of the things they had wanted to do, whether that was traveling to Paris or learning to play the piano. No hard science backs those claims up. For instance, it could be that learning one has cancer will make one show up at the doctor’s office on time and be docile and polite as the doctor explains treatment options.
.
When a person is first diagnosed with cancer and faces her own mortality, it probably makes her acutely aware of all the things she wanted to do in life. Thus, these may not be so much personality traits as common behaviors in people facing a similar situation. It has been argued that some personality traits help people cope better with cancer. For instance, being tough or having a fighting spirit is thought to be helpful to endure cancer treatment. While this may be true, it is difficult for science to measure this sort of thing.
.
 Besides that, many people do not really find out how tough they are until they are faced with a crisis. While a strong, fighting personality is useful, it may not be an everyday personality trait. When it comes to coping with cancer and enduring cancer treatment, social ties also have a strong positive effect.
 .
Being surrounded by family and friends really does matter. The point is that some perfectly happy, strong, smart people get cancer and some people who are a hot mess do not. Our best defenses are a healthy lifestyle, exercise, regular checkups and friends and family. Maybe friends and family come at the top of that list!
.

It was once thought that people with certain personality traits were particularly susceptible to cancer. Neurotic people and introverts, in particular, were believed to be especially at risk for developing the disease. Personality type was also thought to play a role in whether people stricken with cancer would die of it.

In the early 1960s, for example, a study tentatively found that male lung cancer patients were more likely to be extroverted and less likely to be neurotic than males without cancer. A study from the early 1980s suggested that people with lower levels of neuroticism and anxiety, as measured on standardized tests, were at an increased risk of breast cancer. Many of these studies were discredited because they involved small numbers of people, were poorly designed, and poorly run.
.
Another problem was that some scientific journals tended to publish studies showing a link between cancer and personality, while rejecting studies that found no link. The result, according to the American Cancer Society, was a widespread belief that there is a scientific basis for cancer-prone personality types.
.

Recent research has largely debunked such notions. A 2010 study involving 60,000 people in Sweden and Finland found no link between personality and overall cancer risk, and no link between personality traits and cancer survival. A Japanese study from 2003 looked for a connection between four personality traits – extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism, and deception – and four different types of cancer. It found none.

Even though there doesn’t appear to be a biological connection between personality type and cancer risk, certain traits are associated with behaviors that can raise or lower that risk. For example, highly health-conscious people are unlikely to engage in activities – like smoking, overeating, or basking in the sun too long – associated with cancer. People who pay less attention to diet and exercise may put themselves at higher risk for the disease.

“Although there is no biological association between personality traits and cancer risk, how an individual copes with cancer can have a positive effect on reducing distress and improving quality of life,” says Halyna Vitagliano, MD, MSci, a specialist in psychosocial oncology at Dana-Farber states,  “Good coping strategies  include  getting enough sleep; maintaining a healthy, well-balanced diet; exercising; and also engaging in emotionally meaningful activities; and nurturing supportive relationships with loved ones.

Good coping skills  means avoiding behaviors  that are known biological risk factors for cancer, such as exposure to the sun’s harmful UV light, drinking excessively, and smoking. Good self-care and resilience go a long way in navigating the cancer journey.”

 So when someone passes away from natural treatments should it be said that they had  the wrong personality. I think these issues play against your chances of survival also.

1) If you believe there’s an appointed ‘time’ for us to pass away or not.

2) If the person had more going on “inside” than they could figure out to do on their own.

3) If the person had enough understanding, advice, wisdom or proper care to really treat what they were going through naturally

4) If the person was actually following all of the things they were supposed to do.

5) If the person could afford to do all of the things they were needing to do.

6) Also did they test or guess … et cetera.

 For the naysayers, many things like taking Activated Charcoal or using Anti Angiogenics for example, to some might seem silly and they don’t fully understand their impact. However, The more I learn, the better I feel as I try and employ new things to my health regime. The rest of this is mental/emotional and those are things we can’t control about anyone’s life, much less our own but we do our best. 
 
 Sometimes people go through soul-crushing hurts and pains and problems and we just don’t know how to recover or revitalize ourselves afterwards… I say plan for the careful path toward every healthy thing you can do for yourself.  Also plan as though you have a limited time and love every moment you have.
 
If we look at everyone who dies and try to judge them and tell ourself they weren’t totally focused on themselves, Then no treatment will be classed as working, but if we look at how many peoples standard of lives have been improved and also how many cancer has gone into remission, as well, we will get a more accurate picture. There are statistics to every protocol.  So no treatment is 100% perfect. I have seen people who tried the Gerson therapy, who didn’t progress, try cannabis oil successfully. Then again, I have also seen cannabis oil fail others and Gerson work. This is why no one treatment should be the only treatment for an illness.
                             *******************************************************

Did you know them and their true daily habits, what age they were, how they grew up and when they changed their diets or if they even did. How old they are now and what challenges they faced and for how long?

All I know is we will all pass someday no matter how pure our diet is and if I was to pass tomorrow people would probably question what I do or am saying here, but I can share with you this one thing. Everyone makes mistakes and everyone does what they know best, but no one knows it all. More than anything we have a long way to go to truly understanding…things like  what it means to detox safely.

Once you finally awaken from 60 years of bad diet, abusive lifestyle and unhealthy liver you can get sick and not recover from it while you are trying to do just that. One persons perfect diet is another persons poison. The bodies job is to eliminate toxic waste and our job is to help it do that by learning to listen to it and giving it what it needs to stay strong, healthy and flexible.

 
“God knew the day I was born how many days I have to live its coded in our DNA.
.
There is nothing any regular or natural doctor can do to change that.
Where my free will comes in is how well I live out those days based on the choices that I make.” I pray daily that when I die it’s not cancer that takes my life. I have been learning my particular cancer lesson for just a lil over a 11years now. I am stronger and healthier now than I was a year ago. 
 
Well having walked this path with my own feet; it is hard to judge other people when you don’t have the whole picture; factors that are different in so many cases prove to us the outcomes may be different, Some will surivive the cancer, but not live; others will succumb and never gain remission, others gain remission. Where you live, what you eat, what you do, and what you have used before the protocol all play a huge role in the outcome.
 
 For us a healhty person, living on natural products, gets cancer, sucked into conventional, changes course, survives cancer and and dies of conventional damage. This is an all too familar story. For those of us whom speak, do we really see the whole picture. What we do know is conventional has a poor outcome; so if you are risk taker, just try it; otherwise look to treatments that show remission rates you are satisfied with and then put your hope into gear.”
.
This entry was posted in Thought Provoking. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.